How We Hire, Monitor, and Guarantee
The industry is built on resume roulette and hope. You get a list of candidates, interview them yourself, hire someone, and then have zero visibility into whether they are actually performing. Most vendors disappear after placement. You are left managing quality alone.
We screen hundreds of candidates using data-driven sourcing and CTO-led evaluation
Automated code monitoring from day one. Weekly CTO reports on quality, velocity, and collaboration
30-day quality guarantee. Free replacement if they don't perform
Not just a coding test. We evaluate candidates through architecture discussions, code review exercises, and real-world problem solving.
We assess how they think, not just what they know. Can they debug a complex system? Design a scalable solution? Review someone else's code and spot the edge cases?
A great coder who can't communicate is a liability. We screen for timezone reliability, Slack responsiveness, English fluency, and meeting etiquette.
Our developers come from Pakistan, Africa, and LATAM — all vetted for full US business hours coverage. No more waiting until tomorrow morning for a response.
Every candidate is reviewed by a fractional CTO before they reach your desk. These aren't junior recruiters with a checklist — they're battle-tested CTOs who have scaled systems to millions of users.
They evaluate technical depth, leadership potential, and team fit. If a candidate can't explain their architectural decisions or defend their code choices, they don't move forward.
You meet one candidate — the best match. Not a shortlist of 5 to waste your time sifting through resumes and scheduling interviews.
If they're not right, we go back to our pipeline immediately. No pressure to settle. No "close enough" hires.
The vetting doesn't stop at hire. We monitor code quality from day one, provide weekly CTO reports, and back every placement with a 30-day quality guarantee.
If a developer isn't performing or can't meet timezone expectations, we replace them — no additional cost. Valid reasons include performance issues, missed deadlines, or timezone misalignment.
| Feature | Mavric | Toptal | BairesDev | Turing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance Rate | Hundreds screened per role | "Top 3%" | "<1%" | Not disclosed |
| CTO Review | Every candidate | Some placements | No | No |
| Placement Speed | Days | 1-2 weeks | 1-3 weeks | 3-7 days |
| Code Monitoring | From day one | No | No | No |
| Weekly Reporting | CTO-led reports | No | No | No |
| Quality Guarantee | 30 days, free replacement | Varies | Limited | 14 days |
| Replacement Rate | <5% | Not disclosed | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
You write the job description. You source candidates on Upwork or Fiverr. You interview 15 people. You hire someone and hope for the best. When they ghost or underperform, you start over.
You tell us what you need. We screen hundreds. You interview one. They start with monitoring on day one. Every week your CTO reviews their work. If they don't perform, we replace free.
Get a vetted developer in days, not weeks. Every placement backed by CTO oversight and a 30-day guarantee.
